Sarah Palin at 26 weeks pregnant? Is it true? Inquiring minds should want to know.
I admit it. The header on this post is tacky. But given that McCain is refusing to go anywhere without his new Vagina, Sarah Palin, I don't see why I can't continue the theme here. I mean, really. If he can flash his Vagina at every campaign stop, is it really so wrong for bloggers to take a poke at it?
McCain is clearly trying to capitalize on the Vagina Mania that has resulted from the Palin Pick. He is flaunting his Vagina everywhere, and acts all indignant when someone rubs it the wrong way. This is a departure from the standard thinking of the Conservative Male, who has always implied that anyone showing off their Vagina is just asking for it.
The GOP can't expect to have it both ways. On one hand, they are telling us what a tough cookie Sarah Palin is, even as they try to shield her with the other. The security around McCain's Vagina is tighter than a chastity belt.
She's hardly allowed out alone, and the media deserves a rap on the knuckles for being afraid to look mean by asking the hard questions about what little they know. Take for instance this whole business of Sarah Palin's five month old baby. When it was implied that the child might actually be her daughter Bristol's, the cry of outrage was deafening.
"Of course that baby came out of McCain's Vagina!" they insisted.
After all, how dare anyone suggest that a fundamentalist Christian, anti-abortion, abstinence-advocating, Republican politician would attempt to pass off her daughter's pregnancy as her own to save political face.
How dare they suggest that said politician's visual absence of a pregnancy until the surprise last minute announcement, combined with said daughter's eight-month absence from school be anything more than a coincidence!
How dare anyone be so cynical as to doubt that a politician hungering for the second highest post in the land would cover something like that up!
God forbid someone actually examine the whole situation in detail! To do so would be to risk being called a sexist. Or worse, mean!
It would take a brave person indeed to examine these allegations. Unfortunately, you won't find anyone like that in the media, which is handling McCain's Vagina with a kid glove, as opposed to the standard latex.
But today someone sent me a link to a Web site that has finally done what the media is failing to do - take a good hard look at the possibility that Sarah Palin may not be Trig's mother, but his grandmother.
The Web site is www.palindeception.com and I insist that you visit it, because you'll find analysis and questions regarding this situation that you won't find anywhere else. The authors are not crackpots; they are a husband and wife team who have some knowledge to back up their suspicions. The woman is a mother and lactation counselor, her husband a physician. Both allow for the fact that Palin may be telling the truth, while examining facts that look very sketchy when you take them as a whole.
To those of you who think my posting this is just awful, awful, awful let me just ask you to consider this: PalinDeception.com raises some very good questions that need to be addressed. If Sarah Palin lied about giving birth to Trig, it is no small thing. It is huge. Because a person who would implement this kind of cover-up - a person this willing to sacrifice principle for power - is capable of doing anything to keep that power.
And we know what we call that kind of person, don't we?
That's right. We call them Karl Rove.
Think about it. Study up. And don't be afraid to question, even if the media is.